A person I very much respect explained to me why he accepts and even endorses current establishment policies, including using drones to attack enemies on whom we have not officially declared war and repeatedly electing persons who clearly have no intention of following through on promises made to the electorate during campaigns. He justified this as being "The normal level of hypocrisy."
For me this is a baffling statement of acceptance, but I do believe it expresses the norm for what passes for political thought in my country. I think this also explains why we continue to have truly terrible governance.
I acknowledge that every system involving more than one person requires compromise. But there is the point at which you have ceded the entire argument to someone leveraging the knowledge that you will compromise more and more easily the more pressure they bring to bear, to the point that you've compromised away anything of value to you at all.
In the old tale the scorpion asks the frog to compromise and the frog agrees, even though he can predict the fatal outcome of such an arrangement. The political establishment is asking the public to compromise yet again. "Allow us to continue to have the same people run things continuing the policies that are already in place and we promise to effect change," they say. From all appearances, my countrymen are ready to accept this "compromise" yet again.
Can anyone remind me, what's a word for doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different outcome?